Emotions, and Us vs. Them

Emotions, and Us vs. Them

Social contexts shift implicit attitudes and behavior toward outgroups

Although past work had assumed that implicit attitudes and stereotypes are learned early in life and change slowly, our research shows immense plasticity in people’s implicit attitudes and beliefs toward social groups in response to small changes in local environments.

For example, situations that arouse negative emotions like anger and disgust increase implicit bias. Implicit bias in the mind can translate into behavior when the motivation to be egalitarian is not a high priority or when it’s difficult to control one’s behavior.

On the positive side, we find when people see images and stories of admired members of negatively stereotyped groups (racial and ethnic groups, lesbians and gay men, women leaders, the elderly), they subsequently express less implicit race bias, anti-gay bias, gender bias, and age bias. When people see admired images and stories of some groups (e.g., gays and lesbians) they subsequently express more support for gay and lesbian civil rights.

Interestingly, we find that positive media images of negatively stereotyped groups are especially impactful for people who have little or no real-life contact with members of these groups in their daily life.

 

Key Publications:

Kurdi, B., Sanchez, A., Dasgupta. N., & Banaji, M.R.(2024). (When) do counterattitudinal exemplars shift implicit racial evaluations? Replications and extensions of Dasgupta and Greenwald (2001). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 126(4), 543-565.  [get paper]

Greenwald, A., Dasgupta, N., Dovidio, J., Kang, J., Moss-Racusin, C., & Teachman, B. (2022). Implicit-bias remedies: Treating discriminatory bias as a public-health problem. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 23(1), 7–40. [get paper]

Dasgupta, N. (2013). Implicit attitudes and beliefs adapt to situations: A decade of research on the malleability of implicit prejudice, stereotypes, and the self-concept. In P.G. Devine and E.A. Plant (Eds.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 233-279. UK: Academic Press. [get paper]

Kang, J., Bennett, M., Carbado, D., Casey, P., Dasgupta, N., Faigman, D., Godsil, R., Greenwald, A. G., Levinson, J., & Mnookin, J. (2012). Implicit bias in the courtroom. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1124-1186. [get paper]

Yogeeswaran, K., Dasgupta, N., & Gomez, C. (2012). A new American dilemma? The effect of ethnic identification and public service on the national inclusion of ethnic minorities. European Journal of Social Psychology. 42, 691-705. [get paper]

Asgari, S., Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2012). When do counterstereotypic ingroup members inspire vs. deflate? The effect of successful professional women on women’s leadership self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 370-383. [get paper]

Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept and professional goals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255-270. [get paper]

Yogeeswaran, K., Dasgupta, N., Adelman, L., Eccleston, A., & Parker, M. (2011). To be or not to be (ethnic): The hidden cost of ethnic identification for Americans of European and Non-European origin. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 908-914. [get paper]

Kang, J., Dasgupta, N., Yogeeswaran, K., & Blasi, G. (2010). Are ideal litigators White? Measuring the myth of colorblindness. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7, 886-915.[get paper]

Yogeeswaran, K., & Dasgupta, N. (2010). Will the “real” American please stand up? The effect of implicit stereotypes about nationality on discriminatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1332-1345. [get paper]

Dasgupta, N., DeSteno, D.A., Williams, L., & Hunsinger, M. (2009). Fanning the flames of prejudice: The influence of specific incidental emotions on implicit prejudice. Emotion, 9, 585-591. [get paper]

Dasgupta, N. (2009). Mechanisms underlying malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes: The role of automaticity versus cognitive control. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. [get paper]

Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. M. (2008). When social context matters: The influence of long-term contact and short-term exposure to admired outgroup members on implicit attitudes and behavioral intentions. Social Cognition, 26, 54-66. [get paper]

McCall, C., & Dasgupta, N. (2007). The malleability of men’s gender self-concepts. Self and Identity, 6, 173-188. [get paper]

Dasgupta, N., & Rivera, L. M. (2006).  From automatic anti-gay prejudice to behavior: The moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 268-280. [get paper]

Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642-658. [get paper]

Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research, 17, 143-169. [get paper]

DeSteno, D. A., Dasgupta, N., Bartlett, M. Y., & Cajdric, A. (2004). Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes.  Psychological Science, 15, 319-324.[get paper]

Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A.G. (2001).  On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814. [get paper]